|
1. Claude
Panaccio: Late Medieval Nominalism
and Non-Veridical Concepts (provides a detailed critique of a
central argument of my John Buridan), and here is my reply: Demon Skepticism and
Non-Veridical Concepts, read at the 2009 APA convention in
NYC
2. Buridan on Substantial
Unity and Substantial Concepts, comments
on Henrik Lagerlund: John Buridan's Empiricism
and the Knowledge of Substances, read at the UWO Colloquium,
October 9, 2009
3. "Intentional Transfer in
Averroes, Indifference of Nature in Avicenna, and the Issue of the
Representationalism of Aquinas" comments on Richard Taylor’s
and Max Herrera’s papers
4. "Putting Skeptics in Their
Place vs. Stopping Them in Their Tracks", comments by
Giorgio
Pini and John Greco, and
my replies
5. Reply to Tony
Roark on Tarski and Klima:
Conceptual Closure in Anselm’s Proof
6. Contemporary 'Essentialism' vs. Aristotelian Essentialism
7. Comments on Klima,
Contemporary "Essentialism" vs. Aristotelian Essentialism,
by
Michael Kremer
8. Reply to Michael Kremer
9. Nulla virtus cognoscitiva
circa proprium obiectum decipitur comments on Robert Pasnau: The Identity of the Knower and the Known
10. Review
of Anthony Kenny: Aquinas on Mind
11.
Comments on Peter King: "The Failure of Ockham’s
Nominalism"
12. "Is Ockham off the hook?"
13. Reply to David Burrell's
comments
on "Man = Body + Soul:
Aquinas's Arithmetic of Human Nature"
14. "What can a scholastic do in
the 21st century?"
15. Comments on Jack
Zupko: "Philosophy Among the
Artistae: A Late-Medieval Picture of the Limits of Rational Inquiry"
16. "Semantic Complexity and
Syntactic Simplicity in Ockham's Mental Language" comments on
Yiwei Zheng: "Ockham's Connotation Theory and Ontological Elimination"
|
