|
Discussion
|
- Claude Panaccio: Late Medieval
Nominalism and Non-Veridical Concepts (provides a detailed critique
of a central argument of my John
Buridan), and here is my reply: Demon
Skepticism and Non-Veridical Concepts, read at the 2009 APA
convention in NYC
- Buridan
on Substantial Unity and Substantial
Concepts, comments on Henrik Lagerlund: John
Buridan's Empiricism and the Knowledge of Substances, read at the
UWO Colloquium, October 9, 2009
- "Intentional Transfer in Averroes,
Indifference of Nature in Avicenna, and the Issue of the
Representationalism of Aquinas" comments on Richard Taylor’s
and Max Herrera’s papers
- "Putting Skeptics in Their Place vs. Stopping
Them in Their Tracks", comments by Giorgio Pini and John Greco, and my replies
- Reply to Tony Roark on Tarski and Klima: Conceptual Closure in
Anselm’s Proof
- Contemporary 'Essentialism' vs. Aristotelian
Essentialism
- Comments on Klima,
Contemporary "Essentialism" vs. Aristotelian Essentialism, by
Michael Kremer
- Reply to Michael Kremer
- Nulla
virtus cognoscitiva
circa proprium obiectum
decipitur comments on Robert Pasnau: The Identity of
the Knower and the Known
- Review of Anthony Kenny: Aquinas on Mind
- Comments on Peter
King: "The
Failure of Ockham’s Nominalism"
- "Is Ockham off the hook?"
- Reply to David
Burrell's
comments on "Man
= Body + Soul: Aquinas's Arithmetic of Human Nature"
- "What can a scholastic
do in the 21st century?"
- Comments on Jack
Zupko: "Philosophy
Among the Artistae: A Late-Medieval Picture of
the Limits of Rational Inquiry"
- "Semantic Complexity
and Syntactic Simplicity in Ockham's Mental Language" Yiwei Zheng: "Ockham's Connotation Theory and Ontological Elimination"
|